Farm Subsidy information
Tuscarawas County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Tuscarawas County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 950
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tuscarawas County, Ohio totaled $69,847,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Alvin D Fillman | Port Washington, OH 43837 | $116,284 |
102 | Linda S Sigrist | Dundee, OH 44624 | $116,224 |
103 | David H Shurtz | West Lafayette, OH 43845 | $115,993 |
104 | Jack Shurtz | West Lafayette, OH 43845 | $115,808 |
105 | Gene Chumney | Mineral City, OH 44656 | $113,928 |
106 | Paul Schwab | Port Washington, OH 43837 | $113,404 |
107 | Laroma Co LLC | New Philadelphia, OH 44663 | $111,658 |
108 | Jim Lorenz | Sugarcreek, OH 44681 | $109,975 |
109 | Jerry Lahmers | Newcomerstown, OH 43832 | $106,578 |
110 | Terry L Garber | Strasburg, OH 44680 | $106,423 |
111 | Ray Mutti | New Philadelphia, OH 44663 | $102,878 |
112 | James H Booth | Mineral City, OH 44656 | $100,454 |
113 | Robert E Welling | Navarre, OH 44662 | $96,937 |
114 | John M Foust | Dover, OH 44622 | $96,918 |
115 | Freida I Patterson | Fresno, OH 43824 | $96,425 |
116 | Terry D Edwards | Mineral City, OH 44656 | $94,265 |
117 | Larry W Harding | New Philadelphia, OH 44663 | $94,142 |
118 | Elizabeth D Kaiser | Litchfield, OH 44253 | $93,389 |
119 | Henry I Beachy | Dundee, OH 44624 | $90,626 |
120 | Gano Farms Inc | New Philadelphia, OH 44663 | $90,245 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”