Farm Subsidy information
Tuscarawas County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Tuscarawas County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 950
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tuscarawas County, Ohio totaled $69,847,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Joseph Edward Mizer, Jr | Stone Creek, OH 43840 | $362,131 |
42 | Glenn M Troyer | Sugarcreek, OH 44681 | $359,610 |
43 | Scot Glazer | Port Washington, OH 43837 | $346,135 |
44 | Cynthia Habrun | Bolivar, OH 44612 | $334,268 |
45 | William W Deetz | Sugarcreek, OH 44681 | $332,992 |
46 | Dan Horn | New Philadelphia, OH 44663 | $328,957 |
47 | Doug D Swihart | Dover, OH 44622 | $328,473 |
48 | Terry Gaskill | Newcomerstown, OH 43832 | $311,458 |
49 | Echo Valley Farms LLC | Stone Creek, OH 43840 | $311,191 |
50 | Welch Brothers LLC | Newcomerstown, OH 43832 | $308,858 |
51 | Fillman Farms Inc | Port Washington, OH 43837 | $305,264 |
52 | John L Sigrist | Dundee, OH 44624 | $302,752 |
53 | Dale Anderson | New Philadelphia, OH 44663 | $299,717 |
54 | David P Mizer | Stone Creek, OH 43840 | $299,570 |
55 | Wen-mar Farms Inc | West Lafayette, OH 43845 | $299,179 |
56 | Glenn Mutti | Stone Creek, OH 43840 | $298,876 |
57 | Carol Bambeck | Dover, OH 44622 | $297,371 |
58 | Dale Loveday | Strasburg, OH 44680 | $263,659 |
59 | Regula Farms | Fresno, OH 43824 | $262,983 |
60 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $239,076 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”