Farm Subsidy information
Williams County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Williams County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,100
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Williams County, Ohio totaled $246,209,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Troy Altaffer | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $567,678 |
62 | Matthew A Grube | Bryan, OH 43506 | $565,697 |
63 | Kenneth E Ruffer | Stryker, OH 43557 | $556,746 |
64 | Marlin Cummins | Alvordton, OH 43501 | $556,315 |
65 | Planson Family Partners Lp | Stryker, OH 43557 | $550,679 |
66 | Brehm Farms LLC | Alvordton, OH 43501 | $549,883 |
67 | Buehrer Industries LLC | West Unity, OH 43570 | $534,609 |
68 | Douglas Carlin | Stryker, OH 43557 | $532,046 |
69 | Ronald Keil | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $530,121 |
70 | John Q Fry | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $529,280 |
71 | Dietsch Enterprises LLC | Edgerton, OH 43517 | $528,051 |
72 | Hake Family Farm LLC | Edon, OH 43518 | $521,835 |
73 | Roger Bennett Lifetime Trust | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $520,836 |
74 | Roger Bennett | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $519,674 |
75 | Vincent Herman | Edgerton, OH 43517 | $517,771 |
76 | Charles Headley | Edon, OH 43518 | $514,354 |
77 | James Herman | Edgerton, OH 43517 | $514,297 |
78 | Fry Farms Ltd | Archbold, OH 43502 | $513,244 |
79 | Kenneth E Vollmer | Edon, OH 43518 | $505,365 |
80 | Henricks Farms | Bryan, OH 43506 | $505,143 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”