Conservation Reserve Program in Williams County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 384
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Williams County, Ohio totaled $1,086,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Shirley E Mercer | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $5,312 |
62 | Ladds Land Co LLC | Stryker, OH 43557 | $5,255 |
63 | Cory L Wickerham | Stryker, OH 43557 | $5,245 |
64 | Gary W Smith | West Unity, OH 43570 | $5,146 |
65 | Eddie J Ruffer | Stryker, OH 43557 | $5,108 |
66 | Clair R Studer | Edgerton, OH 43517 | $5,037 |
67 | Mossburgs 4 Farms LLC | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $5,033 |
68 | Bloir Irrevocable Trust Dated July 8 2014 | Edon, OH 43518 | $4,996 |
69 | Art Trausch Family Farm LLC | Edon, OH 43518 | $4,867 |
70 | Centennial Homestead Acres Inc | Bryan, OH 43506 | $4,862 |
71 | Janet M Morr | Edon, OH 43518 | $4,811 |
72 | Timothy Henricks | Bryan, OH 43506 | $4,629 |
73 | Harry C Fitzenrider Trust | Bryan, OH 43506 | $4,348 |
74 | Richard Meyers | Pioneer, OH 43554 | $4,334 |
75 | Christine A Minney | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $4,312 |
76 | Don A Stoll And Janet A Stoll 2015 Living Trust Da | Fremont, IN 46737 | $4,306 |
77 | Fsb Investment 1 LLC | Bradenton, FL 34203 | $4,222 |
78 | Martin W Sostoi | Montpelier, OH 43543 | $4,157 |
79 | Kevin L Cummins | Alvordton, OH 43501 | $4,068 |
80 | Seacor Farms LLC | Bryan, OH 43506 | $4,045 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”