Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Wood County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 58
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Wood County, Ohio totaled $253,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Carlyle Farms LLC | Wayne, OH 43466 | $162,724 |
2 | Mike L Dierksheide | Bowling Green, OH 43402 | $15,062 |
3 | Stickel Farms Inc | Bowling Green, OH 43402 | $8,738 |
4 | Eckel Cattle Company LLC | Perrysburg, OH 43551 | $6,855 |
5 | Jonathan Haines | Cygnet, OH 43413 | $5,859 |
6 | Chad P Reynolds | Wayne, OH 43466 | $5,292 |
7 | Daniel L Frobose | Pemberville, OH 43450 | $5,222 |
8 | Belleville Bros | Bowling Green, OH 43402 | $4,914 |
9 | Timothy J Franks | Cygnet, OH 43413 | $3,876 |
10 | Nichols Farms LLC | Paulding, OH 45879 | $3,433 |
11 | Kevin Burtchin | Pemberville, OH 43450 | $3,164 |
12 | Thomas A Wolf | Pemberville, OH 43450 | $2,646 |
13 | Brad Leimgruber | Cygnet, OH 43413 | $1,880 |
14 | Calvin Gerwin & Sons | Bradner, OH 43406 | $1,764 |
15 | Mark Bushman | Pemberville, OH 43450 | $1,741 |
16 | Foos Cattle LLC | Bowling Green, OH 43402 | $1,724 |
17 | Derek J Bankey | Custar, OH 43511 | $1,642 |
18 | Donald Beaverson | Bowling Green, OH 43402 | $1,638 |
19 | Steven J Speck | Bowling Green, OH 43402 | $1,134 |
20 | Nicholas C Holley | Bowling Green, OH 43402 | $1,094 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>