Conservation Reserve Program in Wood County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 951
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wood County, Ohio totaled $1,594,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chris Sorensen | Cygnet, OH 43413 | $10,002 |
22 | Rick Emahiser | North Baltimore, OH 45872 | $9,905 |
23 | , | $8,854 | |
24 | Jeffrey Karns | Wayne, OH 43466 | $8,775 |
25 | Mcgrain Farms LLC | Portage, OH 43451 | $8,769 |
26 | James Mesnard | Bloomdale, OH 44817 | $8,472 |
27 | Wynn Andrew Brinker | Pemberville, OH 43450 | $8,368 |
28 | Alan L Kramer | Bowling Green, OH 43402 | $8,271 |
29 | Hathaway Brothers | Fostoria, OH 44830 | $7,776 |
30 | Nancy Risenburg | Gibsonburg, OH 43431 | $7,684 |
31 | Randy Storms | Shelby, OH 44875 | $7,684 |
32 | Daniel L Schimmoeller | Perrysburg, OH 43551 | $7,675 |
33 | P & J Thayer Family Limited Partnership | Paulding, OH 45879 | $7,623 |
34 | William P Kale | Portage, OH 43451 | $7,621 |
35 | Eilert Farms Ltd | Malinta, OH 43535 | $7,516 |
36 | R & R Buchman Farms LLC | Pemberville, OH 43450 | $7,346 |
37 | Christopher D Hiser | Pemberville, OH 43450 | $7,264 |
38 | Ronald Scott Schmidt | Perrysburg, OH 43551 | $7,158 |
39 | Jerry Bihn | Perrysburg, OH 43551 | $7,147 |
40 | Daniel E Reitzel | Perrysburg, OH 43551 | $7,027 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”