Farm Subsidy information
Wyandot County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Wyandot County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 560
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $7,876,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Douglas B Gregg | Nevada, OH 44849 | $12,635 |
42 | Wagner Family Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,522 |
43 | Vaughn G Collins | Kenton, OH 43326 | $12,516 |
44 | Betty Joyce Collins | Kenton, OH 43326 | $12,516 |
45 | Robert G Hawk Rev Trust Agreement | Nevada, OH 44849 | $12,473 |
46 | Clarabelle Farm LLC | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $12,287 |
47 | Kelle Saull | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,110 |
48 | Tyson Saull | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,110 |
49 | Mark Koehler | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $12,105 |
50 | Beverly Mewhorter | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,058 |
51 | James W Guinther | Nevada, OH 44849 | $12,047 |
52 | Clinton Jaqueth Rev Trust | Nevada, OH 44849 | $11,622 |
53 | Rodney Frey | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,495 |
54 | Kevin Collins | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,430 |
55 | Bassler Family Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,376 |
56 | Sheaffer Farms Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,062 |
57 | R & R Pugh Farms Ltd | Marion, OH 43302 | $10,988 |
58 | Scott L Stansbery | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $10,928 |
59 | Paul Searfoss | Kenton, OH 43326 | $10,567 |
60 | Tymochtee Properties LLC | Harpster, OH 43323 | $10,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”