Conservation Reserve Program in Wyandot County, Ohio, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 505
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $2,285,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Douglas B Gregg | Nevada, OH 44849 | $12,635 |
42 | Vaughn G Collins | Kenton, OH 43326 | $12,516 |
43 | Betty Joyce Collins | Kenton, OH 43326 | $12,516 |
44 | Robert G Hawk Rev Trust Agreement | Nevada, OH 44849 | $12,473 |
45 | Clarabelle Farm LLC | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $12,287 |
46 | Kelle Saull | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,110 |
47 | Tyson Saull | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,110 |
48 | Beverly Mewhorter | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,058 |
49 | Clinton Jaqueth Rev Trust | Nevada, OH 44849 | $11,622 |
50 | Rodney Frey | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,495 |
51 | , | $11,430 | |
52 | , | $11,196 | |
53 | R & R Pugh Farms Ltd | Marion, OH 43302 | $10,988 |
54 | Scott L Stansbery | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $10,938 |
55 | Franklin Arnold Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $10,855 |
56 | David E Smith | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $10,343 |
57 | Mark Koehler | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $10,311 |
58 | Bruce Schoenberger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $10,216 |
59 | Dale L Stansbery | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $9,972 |
60 | The Mason Property Management Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $9,927 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”