Conservation Reserve Program in Wyandot County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 523
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $1,702,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sharon Thiel | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $7,463 |
62 | Jason Frey | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $7,359 |
63 | Ryan Wentling | Carey, OH 43316 | $7,091 |
64 | Michael Hendricks | Oregon, OH 43616 | $7,047 |
65 | Karen E Scheck Living Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $6,963 |
66 | Julie A Herring | Harpster, OH 43323 | $6,957 |
67 | James E Strausbaugh | New Washington, OH 44854 | $6,851 |
68 | Timothy M Wood | Forest, OH 45843 | $6,767 |
69 | Anna Bea Heilman Living Tr | Fostoria, OH 44830 | $6,750 |
70 | Carol M Beard Estate | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $6,618 |
71 | Rebecca J Thomas | Kenton, OH 43326 | $6,590 |
72 | Rcj Sheaffer Partnership | Morral, OH 43337 | $6,501 |
73 | Paul Brodman Living Trust | Carey, OH 43316 | $6,437 |
74 | Allen D Dible | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $6,392 |
75 | Kevin Collins | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $6,388 |
76 | Debra Boes Rev Trust | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $6,381 |
77 | David Karcher | Carey, OH 43316 | $6,344 |
78 | Cheryl Sammet | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $6,287 |
79 | Marie Frey | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $6,259 |
80 | Virginia Weininger Rev Trust | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $6,155 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”