Production Flexibility Program in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,083
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $19,937,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | R & M Metzger | Forest, OH 45843 | $67,424 |
82 | Gilbert Murphy | Nevada, OH 44849 | $67,337 |
83 | Dallas Parsell | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $67,105 |
84 | Link Cole | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $66,759 |
85 | Eugene Griffin | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $66,428 |
86 | James D Lehnhart | Waynesboro, VA 22980 | $65,872 |
87 | Jeffrey Bowen | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $65,484 |
88 | Keith B Koehler | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $65,405 |
89 | Bruce Schoenberger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $65,098 |
90 | David Riedlinger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $65,090 |
91 | James P Welly | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $63,870 |
92 | Janice Young | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $62,817 |
93 | Fred Zulauf | Nevada, OH 44849 | $62,673 |
94 | Lynn A Gottfried | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $62,248 |
95 | James D Schilling | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $61,706 |
96 | Thomas M Bils | Harpster, OH 43323 | $60,822 |
97 | David Wolfe Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $60,026 |
98 | Patricia A Kin | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $58,970 |
99 | N Lynn Stillberger Rev Trust | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $58,151 |
100 | Roger R Bash | Wharton, OH 43359 | $57,887 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”