Farm Subsidy information
Wyandot County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Wyandot County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 895
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $11,804,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mott Buckland Farms Inc | Carey, OH 43316 | $19,131 |
102 | Don Wilson | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $19,047 |
103 | Jeffrey Bowen | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $18,948 |
104 | Timothy M Wood | Forest, OH 45843 | $18,942 |
105 | Corey A Brodman | Carey, OH 43316 | $18,709 |
106 | Daniel Thiel | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $18,535 |
107 | Neil Bair | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $18,468 |
108 | Joshua A Osborn | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $18,465 |
109 | Tedd Stief | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $18,383 |
110 | David Karcher | Carey, OH 43316 | $18,339 |
111 | Jatobed Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $18,109 |
112 | Paul Brodman Living Trust | Carey, OH 43316 | $18,070 |
113 | A David Gottfried Living Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $17,959 |
114 | Chris J Vent | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $17,861 |
115 | Kns Farms LLC | Carey, OH 43316 | $17,755 |
116 | Beverly Mewhorter | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $17,559 |
117 | James A Kin | Forest, OH 45843 | $17,315 |
118 | Brent Frobose | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $17,082 |
119 | Lee Bailey | Forest, OH 45843 | $17,062 |
120 | Joseph Yost | Carey, OH 43316 | $16,902 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”