Farm Subsidy information
Wyandot County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Wyandot County, Ohio, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 534
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $7,748,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Carol L Koehler | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $5,496 |
122 | Reile And Co | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $5,438 |
123 | Michael Wolfe Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $5,346 |
124 | Cheryl Sammet | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $5,298 |
125 | Gary Frey | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $5,178 |
126 | Tymochtee Properties LLC | Harpster, OH 43323 | $5,093 |
127 | Ma Be Farms Ltd | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $5,080 |
128 | Ohio Family Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $5,034 |
129 | Ann Field | La Rue, OH 43332 | $4,963 |
130 | Tom Bell | Columbus, OH 43235 | $4,963 |
131 | C B Go Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $4,933 |
132 | Theresa A Theis | New Riegel, OH 44853 | $4,899 |
133 | Aaron Frey | Forest, OH 45843 | $4,896 |
134 | Kenneth W Gatchell | Carey, OH 43316 | $4,820 |
135 | Mcm Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $4,672 |
136 | Martha Feichter | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $4,660 |
137 | Adam D Walter | Vanlue, OH 45890 | $4,592 |
138 | Clayton Bash | Forest, OH 45843 | $4,539 |
139 | James D Schilling | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $4,440 |
140 | James A Smalley | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $4,428 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”