Counter Cyclical Program in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 834
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $4,926,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Paul Brodman Living Trust | Carey, OH 43316 | $12,028 |
122 | Harvester Acres | Carey, OH 43316 | $12,006 |
123 | Ronald Newell | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,953 |
124 | Dale Passet | Wharton, OH 43359 | $11,926 |
125 | Lawrence Passet | Wharton, OH 43359 | $11,926 |
126 | Robert L Stuckey | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,719 |
127 | Tom Needs | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,668 |
128 | Bruce Schoenberger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,569 |
129 | David L Walter | Carey, OH 43316 | $11,553 |
130 | Michael J Walter | Carey, OH 43316 | $11,553 |
131 | David Riedlinger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,472 |
132 | Thyber Land Co Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,248 |
133 | Dale Huston Rev Trust | Carey, OH 43316 | $11,246 |
134 | Franklin Mcclain Rev Trust | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $11,112 |
135 | Dan L Mcclain | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $11,112 |
136 | Robert O Lust | Mc Cutchenville, OH 44844 | $11,023 |
137 | N Lynn Stillberger Rev Trust | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $10,988 |
138 | Paul M Bushong | Mount Blanchard, OH 45867 | $10,927 |
139 | Gary L Alban | Nevada, OH 44849 | $10,887 |
140 | H M J Holdings | Carey, OH 43316 | $10,563 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”