Conservation Reserve Program in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,223

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $34,254,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
121James D SchillingUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$78,652
122Charles E BeaschlerMc Cutchenville, OH 44844$78,201
123Kenneth Riedlinger Rev TrustUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$76,023
124Jerry KimmellHarrod, OH 45850$75,336
125Gerald VonsteinNevada, OH 44849$74,659
126Kenneth WolfeUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$74,208
127John WagnerUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$74,187
128Herring FarmsHarpster, OH 43323$74,082
129James A SmalleyUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$73,752
130J & J Investment Properties LtdUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$73,551
131John M Putnam Rev TrustCarey, OH 43316$73,174
132Robert L Walter JrDunkirk, OH 45836$73,072
133Ed NeedsUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$72,262
134Donald Riedel Est N Riedel ExecSycamore, OH 44882$72,055
135Herring Farms II, LLCHarpster, OH 43323$71,833
136The Mason Property Management TrustUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$71,230
137Clyde BellUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$70,582
138Carol L & Raymond W Stewart Rev TFindlay, OH 45840$69,459
139Franklin Arnold Rev TrustUpper Sandusky, OH 43351$69,371
140Paul Brodman Living TrustCarey, OH 43316$69,047

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag