Farm Subsidy information
Wyandot County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Wyandot County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 895
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $11,804,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Killdeer Properties LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $13,702 |
142 | Lynn Riedlinger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $13,477 |
143 | Ann E Suber | Carey, OH 43316 | $13,410 |
144 | Francis Tschanen | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $13,169 |
145 | John Fredritz | Carey, OH 43316 | $12,938 |
146 | Richard E Daniel | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $12,935 |
147 | Rodney Frey | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,889 |
148 | Miriam Kin | Forest, OH 45843 | $12,562 |
149 | Vaughn G Collins | Kenton, OH 43326 | $12,516 |
150 | Betty Joyce Collins | Kenton, OH 43326 | $12,516 |
151 | Wagner Family Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,428 |
152 | Clarabelle Farm LLC | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $12,287 |
153 | Robert O Lust | Mc Cutchenville, OH 44844 | $12,261 |
154 | Murphy Family Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,241 |
155 | Gaylord G Derr | Carey, OH 43316 | $12,173 |
156 | David L Walter | Carey, OH 43316 | $12,138 |
157 | Dallas Parsell | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,126 |
158 | Kelle Saull | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,110 |
159 | Tyson Saull | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $12,110 |
160 | Paul E Miller | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,982 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”