Conservation Reserve Program in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,223
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $34,254,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | C H Mccarthy Corporation | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $705,957 |
2 | Craig Frisch | Forest, OH 45843 | $439,587 |
3 | Van Orians | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $420,059 |
4 | David T Courtad | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $359,206 |
5 | John Clinger Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $357,838 |
6 | Neil Bair | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $331,547 |
7 | Emery Walton | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $329,622 |
8 | Thiel Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $300,745 |
9 | Lee Bailey | Forest, OH 45843 | $287,362 |
10 | Daryl Ruehle Rev Trust | Mc Cutchenville, OH 44844 | $266,085 |
11 | Hubert Sheaffer Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $265,933 |
12 | Darrel Walton Rev Trust | Placida, FL 33946 | $251,457 |
13 | Sjc Homestead LLC | Columbus, OH 43209 | $245,674 |
14 | Dallas Parsell | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $242,674 |
15 | Mark Koehler | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $240,223 |
16 | Thyber Land Co Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $231,363 |
17 | Joseph Musgrave | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $230,336 |
18 | Tvreber Ltd | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $229,061 |
19 | Daniel Thiel | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $228,262 |
20 | Robert L Walter Sr Rev Trust | Forest, OH 45843 | $225,753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>