Market Loss Assistance Program in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 967
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $10,629,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lynn Rothlisberger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $71,617 |
22 | Romanko Farms Inc | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $67,866 |
23 | Leo J Smalley | Wharton, OH 43359 | $67,747 |
24 | Bernard G Bils | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $66,162 |
25 | Mark E Romich Living Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $65,957 |
26 | James A Smalley | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $65,492 |
27 | Gary Walter | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $65,264 |
28 | Neil Bair | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $64,191 |
29 | Scott L Stansbery | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $64,065 |
30 | Larry Ross Farm Account | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $61,480 |
31 | Robert Gene Hawk Rev Trust | Nevada, OH 44849 | $59,505 |
32 | Barbara Bickham | Harpster, OH 43323 | $57,498 |
33 | Katharine F Kenan | , 00000 | $57,481 |
34 | J Craig Bowman | Harpster, OH 43323 | $57,480 |
35 | Kenneth Riedlinger Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $56,688 |
36 | Jeffrey A Wolf | Carey, OH 43316 | $56,357 |
37 | Jerry L Murphy | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $55,396 |
38 | Jerry L Huston | Wharton, OH 43359 | $55,250 |
39 | Leslie Family Trust-james Leslie | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $54,764 |
40 | Ralph F Culver | Harpster, OH 43323 | $53,942 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”