Conservation Reserve Program in Oklahoma, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,258
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Oklahoma totaled $16,290,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jesse W James | Boise City, OK 73933 | $45,765 |
22 | Gayla J James | Boise City, OK 73933 | $45,765 |
23 | Aubrey Foreman Farms Inc | Perry, OK 73077 | $45,632 |
24 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $45,258 |
25 | Arthur Lowane Williamson Revocable Living Trust | Felt, OK 73937 | $44,663 |
26 | Joe Heitschmidt | Oklahoma City, OK 73127 | $43,794 |
27 | James & Jana Motley Jv | Hollis, OK 73550 | $43,754 |
28 | Doak-crabtree Ranch Trust Crabtree | Stratford, TX 79084 | $43,533 |
29 | David Harrison | Tyrone, OK 73951 | $42,286 |
30 | Clay Preston Crabtree | Boise City, OK 73933 | $41,748 |
31 | Sharon L Bookstore | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $41,625 |
32 | J & J Farms | Forgan, OK 73938 | $41,304 |
33 | Lloyd E Tucker | Keyes, OK 73947 | $39,181 |
34 | Virginia S Myers | Lubbock, TX 79423 | $38,895 |
35 | Belva Witt | Perryton, TX 79070 | $38,831 |
36 | Theodore Sutton Inheritance Tr | Laverne, OK 73848 | $38,457 |
37 | Stanley W Holloway | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $37,764 |
38 | Fred Kamp | Laverne, OK 73848 | $37,521 |
39 | Marie Holloway | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $36,707 |
40 | Opal L Cryer | Boise City, OK 73933 | $35,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”