Farm Subsidy information
Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 162,996
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oklahoma totaled $13,140,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Farm Credit Of Enid ** | Enid, OK 73703 | $3,662,442 |
42 | Lanie Farms Gp | Manchester, OK 73758 | $3,651,989 |
43 | Kennemer Farm Partnership | Carter, OK 73627 | $3,600,964 |
44 | Fischer & Fischer | Hooker, OK 73945 | $3,552,667 |
45 | Glass Farms | Alva, OK 73717 | $3,545,559 |
46 | Johnnie Bert Stewart | Keyes, OK 73947 | $3,501,063 |
47 | Walker Land & Cattle Co | Frederick, OK 73542 | $3,494,496 |
48 | Vinyard Farms Partnership | Altus, OK 73521 | $3,457,293 |
49 | Heatly Farms | Mangum, OK 73554 | $3,455,788 |
50 | Kenneth Mitchell | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $3,436,252 |
51 | T & N Farms | Mangum, OK 73554 | $3,434,346 |
52 | Farmers F And F Farms Inc | Fort Cobb, OK 73038 | $3,421,534 |
53 | K & T Farm & Ranch Inc | Frederick, OK 73542 | $3,396,430 |
54 | Mitchell Farms Inc | Frederick, OK 73542 | $3,318,237 |
55 | Tim Osborn | Tuttle, OK 73089 | $3,296,727 |
56 | Laubach Land & Cattle Co | Okeene, OK 73763 | $3,290,411 |
57 | David Smith | Hollis, OK 73550 | $3,280,230 |
58 | Virgil R Worth | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $3,246,502 |
59 | Roger A Holsted | Mountain View, OK 73062 | $3,244,498 |
60 | Jarrod Clinton Stewart | Keyes, OK 73947 | $3,239,567 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”