Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 4,639
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Oklahoma totaled $22,405,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bennie Williams | Claremore, OK 74017 | $26,988 |
82 | Billy Howard | Talihina, OK 74571 | $26,974 |
83 | Jim Ratcliff | Vinita, OK 74301 | $26,910 |
84 | James C Oswald | Keyes, OK 73947 | $26,628 |
85 | Allison C Bennett | Indiahoma, OK 73552 | $26,578 |
86 | Dana Watson | Council Hill, OK 74428 | $26,535 |
87 | Dick Surber | Pawhuska, OK 74056 | $26,531 |
88 | Jimmy R Hill | Apache, OK 73006 | $26,055 |
89 | Terry W Lierle | Hydro, OK 73048 | $25,877 |
90 | John Charles Farris Living Tr | Elk City, OK 73644 | $25,766 |
91 | Jesse Snyder | Prague, OK 74864 | $25,486 |
92 | Luke Metcalf | Hooker, OK 73945 | $25,375 |
93 | Stone Oren | Erick, OK 73645 | $25,276 |
94 | Clifford Wilson | Calvin, OK 74531 | $25,153 |
95 | Laurence Dunn | Gate, OK 73844 | $24,837 |
96 | Shaun R Mcguire | Jay, OK 74346 | $24,632 |
97 | Douglas John Murdock | Felt, OK 73937 | $24,570 |
98 | Maddux Cattle Co | Strong City, OK 73628 | $24,517 |
99 | Bill J Cathey | Edmond, OK 73013 | $24,186 |
100 | Craig Ranches Inc | Okeene, OK 73763 | $23,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”