Conservation Reserve Program in Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,458
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Oklahoma totaled $15,527,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | G Don Williams | Edmond, OK 73034 | $21,759 |
102 | Jerry Lunsford Farms LLC | Guymon, OK 73942 | $21,686 |
103 | C B Dodson | Amarillo, TX 79104 | $21,386 |
104 | Jimmie Janzen | Balko, OK 73931 | $21,359 |
105 | Bert J Swinger Test Trust B | Canton, IL 61520 | $21,319 |
106 | Bar D Ranch Inc | Freedom, OK 73842 | $21,247 |
107 | Lesa Slatten | Forgan, OK 73938 | $21,175 |
108 | Bobby Latham | Claremore, OK 74018 | $20,920 |
109 | Sherrie Haralson | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $20,772 |
110 | Teresa R Lyons Revocable Trust | Broken Arrow, OK 74014 | $20,663 |
111 | Daniel R Robinson | Albuquerque, NM 87123 | $20,465 |
112 | Glenn Brewer Administrative Trust | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $20,076 |
113 | Janice Wilson Crews | Boise City, OK 73933 | $19,981 |
114 | Eddie And Theresa Stafford Revocable Living Trust | Keyes, OK 73947 | $19,757 |
115 | Tabron K Holloway | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $19,687 |
116 | Underwood Farms Inc | Forgan, OK 73938 | $19,639 |
117 | John W Haffner Trust | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $19,558 |
118 | Parker Family Irrevocable Trust | Woodward, OK 73801 | $19,420 |
119 | Angela White | Tulsa, OK 74129 | $19,196 |
120 | Foreman Family Revocable Trust | Goodwell, OK 73939 | $19,193 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”