Loan Deficiency in Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 35,523
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Oklahoma totaled $269,104,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Herbel Land And Cattle | Hooker, OK 73945 | $156,867 |
102 | Metcalf Farms Partnership | Hooker, OK 73945 | $155,091 |
103 | Farmers F And F Farms Inc | Fort Cobb, OK 73038 | $154,866 |
104 | J & B Meeks Farms Inc | Tipton, OK 73570 | $154,759 |
105 | Denver R Buck Living Trust | Bella Vista, AR 72715 | $153,050 |
106 | Fred M Bryan | Optima, OK 73945 | $152,433 |
107 | Dean - Dean H Simmon H Simmons | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $152,168 |
108 | Sammy R Messenger | Granbury, TX 76049 | $151,616 |
109 | Floyd Miller Living Trust | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $151,517 |
110 | Shirley A Miller Living Trust | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $151,516 |
111 | T Williams Ltd | Keyes, OK 73947 | $151,207 |
112 | C & W Farms Inc | Hollister, OK 73551 | $151,058 |
113 | Jimmie Purvine | Fay, OK 73646 | $149,606 |
114 | Joel Eugene Imler | Boise City, OK 73933 | $147,062 |
115 | Jeffery Wayne Compton | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $146,069 |
116 | Bourk Farms Inc | Boise City, OK 73933 | $145,938 |
117 | Leon R Jacobs | Okarche, OK 73762 | $145,814 |
118 | H & H Farms | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $145,777 |
119 | Raymon Lunsford | Guymon, OK 73942 | $144,642 |
120 | Perry Castonguay Farms | Omega, OK 73764 | $144,354 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”