Total Conservation Programs in Oklahoma, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,831
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Oklahoma totaled $14,908,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mcclung Land Co LLC | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $24,882 |
102 | Nall-jernigan Legacy Farms LLC | Santa Fe, NM 87505 | $24,764 |
103 | Lowe Land & Livestock Ltd | Keyes, OK 73947 | $24,684 |
104 | Texas County Land & Cattle LLC | Hooker, OK 73945 | $24,515 |
105 | , | $24,513 | |
106 | Stafford Family Ranch LLC | Weleetka, OK 74880 | $24,292 |
107 | Lisco LLC | Guymon, OK 73942 | $24,272 |
108 | Flanagan Land & Cattle Inc | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $24,223 |
109 | R G Grounds | Hooker, OK 73945 | $24,090 |
110 | Jesse Motley | Aquilla, TX 76622 | $24,038 |
111 | David Wayne Crawford | Boise City, OK 73933 | $23,912 |
112 | , | $23,872 | |
113 | Foreman Family Revocable Trust | Goodwell, OK 73939 | $23,825 |
114 | Loyola Paulette Ellsworth | Boise City, OK 73933 | $23,617 |
115 | Charley B Thrasher Trust | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $23,593 |
116 | Mr Edwin-edwin K. Sanve Revocable Living Tr K Sanv | Elk City, OK 73644 | $23,541 |
117 | Eugene & Florence Regier Rev Fam Tr | Turpin, OK 73950 | $23,534 |
118 | Teresa Kay Davis | Garden City, KS 67846 | $23,511 |
119 | John Patrick Bourk | Boise City, OK 73933 | $23,442 |
120 | Dan E O'hair | Laverne, OK 73848 | $23,379 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”