Total Commodity Programs in Oklahoma, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 117,403
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Oklahoma totaled $5,646,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Glen Harvey | Lookeba, OK 73053 | $2,405,383 |
42 | Hardzog Farms | Elgin, OK 73538 | $2,400,749 |
43 | Connie Lynn Clemans | Guymon, OK 73942 | $2,397,603 |
44 | Alan James Clemans | Guymon, OK 73942 | $2,391,863 |
45 | Kreutziger Farm & Ranch Inc | Davidson, OK 73530 | $2,313,732 |
46 | Bouziden Brothers And Sons | Alva, OK 73717 | $2,304,093 |
47 | Hf&r Gen Part | Frederick, OK 73542 | $2,286,447 |
48 | Blaser Farms Inc | Tyrone, OK 73951 | $2,262,944 |
49 | Flat Prairie Farms Inc | Tyrone, OK 73951 | $2,262,753 |
50 | Paul Horton Farms Inc | Hollis, OK 73550 | $2,262,711 |
51 | Johnson Brothers Partnership Grain & Livestock | Afton, OK 74331 | $2,253,887 |
52 | Bureau Of Indian Affairs | Winnebago, NE 68071 | $2,237,882 |
53 | Gossen Family Farm & Ranch - Gen Ptn | Corn, OK 73024 | $2,231,800 |
54 | Leroy Hart Rev Trust | Lookeba, OK 73053 | $2,227,914 |
55 | Homer Ryan | Frederick, OK 73542 | $2,223,060 |
56 | L & J Land & Cattle LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,221,334 |
57 | Mock Bros Cattle Co | Altus, OK 73521 | $2,187,058 |
58 | Brian Mitchell | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $2,174,994 |
59 | Barry Squires | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $2,154,753 |
60 | Meacham Farms | Clinton, OK 73601 | $2,130,321 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”