Farm Subsidy information
Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Oklahoma, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 153,607
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oklahoma totaled $11,492,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jacobs Bros Farms Inc | Frederick, OK 73542 | $4,253,114 |
22 | Bouziden Brothers And Sons | Alva, OK 73717 | $4,129,321 |
23 | Thomas & Karen Coomes-jv | Hollis, OK 73550 | $4,125,187 |
24 | Clark & Clark Farms Inc | Sayre, OK 73662 | $4,087,592 |
25 | Williams Farms Of Gould LLC | Gould, OK 73544 | $4,023,402 |
26 | Myrtle O Stevens | Gracemont, OK 73042 | $3,872,051 |
27 | Triple S Farms LLC | Hydro, OK 73048 | $3,825,086 |
28 | Russell Family Partnership | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $3,812,326 |
29 | Blaser Farms Inc | Tyrone, OK 73951 | $3,765,799 |
30 | J & J Farms | Forgan, OK 73938 | $3,735,329 |
31 | Reinschmiedt Fam Gen Prtnrship | Garber, OK 73738 | $3,673,181 |
32 | Gray Cattle Company Joint Venture | Grandfield, OK 73546 | $3,572,444 |
33 | Fischer & Fischer | Hooker, OK 73945 | $3,552,667 |
34 | Blue Chip Farms | Thomas, OK 73669 | $3,506,031 |
35 | Farm Credit Of Enid ** | Enid, OK 73703 | $3,491,713 |
36 | Walker Bros | Okemah, OK 74859 | $3,486,563 |
37 | Glass Farms | Alva, OK 73717 | $3,473,780 |
38 | Lanie Farms Gp | Manchester, OK 73758 | $3,471,631 |
39 | Meacham Farms | Clinton, OK 73601 | $3,436,597 |
40 | Gerald D Brakhage | Lahoma, OK 73754 | $3,435,857 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”