Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Beckham County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 152
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Beckham County, Oklahoma totaled $1,203,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Diane Davis | Carter, OK 73627 | $7,597 |
42 | Herman Seymour | Lexington, OK 73051 | $7,586 |
43 | Louann Largent | Sayre, OK 73662 | $7,413 |
44 | Johnny L Smith | Carter, OK 73627 | $7,190 |
45 | Joel Alexander | Sweetwater, OK 73666 | $7,082 |
46 | Glen R Neece | Elk City, OK 73644 | $6,792 |
47 | Trilbey Kenneth Stone Jr | Carter, OK 73627 | $6,753 |
48 | Jay Puckett | Elk City, OK 73648 | $6,358 |
49 | Sharon Cornelius | Willow, OK 73673 | $6,304 |
50 | Jack A Johnson | Carter, OK 73627 | $6,299 |
51 | Robert A Ohara | Elk City, OK 73644 | $6,274 |
52 | Bobby G Kennemer 1985 Rev Living Tr | Elk City, OK 73644 | $6,143 |
53 | Ray Bills And Mary Bills Revocable Trust | Sayre, OK 73662 | $6,121 |
54 | Glendon Bruening | Elk City, OK 73644 | $6,090 |
55 | Leroy Sanders | Carter, OK 73627 | $6,026 |
56 | Danny Cornelius | Willow, OK 73673 | $5,901 |
57 | Buddy Suthers | Sayre, OK 73662 | $5,673 |
58 | Glynn Stringer | Sayre, OK 73662 | $5,524 |
59 | Karen Stringer | Sayre, OK 73662 | $5,524 |
60 | Vanetta Marie Passmore | Sayre, OK 73662 | $5,516 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”