Loan Deficiency in Beckham County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 720
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Beckham County, Oklahoma totaled $3,823,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ray Bills And Mary Bills Revocable Trust | Sayre, OK 73662 | $7,255 |
122 | Whitledge Family Trust | Sayre, OK 73662 | $7,192 |
123 | Keith L Wilson | Elk City, OK 73644 | $7,180 |
124 | Leroy H Partain | Elk City, OK 73644 | $7,060 |
125 | Glennyss E Holland Rev Tr | Erick, OK 73645 | $6,926 |
126 | Gary Kirk | Elk City, OK 73644 | $6,712 |
127 | Don Carpenter | Erick, OK 73645 | $6,531 |
128 | Jerry L Sanders | Elk City, OK 73644 | $6,393 |
129 | Jimmy Cain | Elk City, OK 73648 | $6,315 |
130 | Roy Holland | Sweetwater, OK 73666 | $6,154 |
131 | Bert Newman | Carter, OK 73627 | $6,108 |
132 | Robert L Williams Rev Tr | Erick, OK 73645 | $6,040 |
133 | Lyda M Jones Sipes Trust | Elk City, OK 73644 | $6,013 |
134 | Wayne Gibson | Erick, OK 73645 | $5,949 |
135 | Luther Mikles | Sayre, OK 73662 | $5,913 |
136 | Tommy Legrand | Sayre, OK 73662 | $5,864 |
137 | Donnie Marshall Trust | Elk City, OK 73648 | $5,858 |
138 | Charles Nutley | Elk City, OK 73644 | $5,798 |
139 | Gary Hall | Elk City, OK 73644 | $5,650 |
140 | Retta F Osborn | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $5,617 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”