Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Beckham County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 446
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Beckham County, Oklahoma totaled $492,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | George P West | Erick, OK 73645 | $832 |
162 | Georgia Reed | Sweetwater, OK 73666 | $818 |
163 | J D Damron | Carter, OK 73627 | $800 |
164 | Donnie Johnson Jr | Elk City, OK 73648 | $784 |
165 | William Andy Blankenship | Elk City, OK 73648 | $783 |
166 | Bill J Grissom | Elk City, OK 73644 | $778 |
167 | Bernadine Merz | Elk City, OK 73644 | $773 |
168 | Dean Damron Trust | Sayre, OK 73662 | $758 |
169 | Kirby Dee Sheperd | Sentinel, OK 73664 | $756 |
170 | Keith L Wilson | Elk City, OK 73644 | $752 |
171 | John Ernest Barnett | Elk City, OK 73644 | $742 |
172 | Lyndel Sanders | Sentinel, OK 73664 | $739 |
173 | J H Anderson | Sweetwater, OK 73666 | $738 |
174 | Roger Dorrell | Texola, OK 73668 | $731 |
175 | Michael Dee Maberry | Elk City, OK 73644 | $730 |
176 | Roger Charles Stanford | Erick, OK 73645 | $722 |
177 | Mr Steven Elton Gurley | Sayre, OK 73662 | $715 |
178 | Carl B Lowrance | Sayre, OK 73662 | $709 |
179 | Gary Thetford | Sayre, OK 73662 | $699 |
180 | Rick Pennington | Bolivar, MO 65613 | $696 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”