Farm Subsidy information
Caddo County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Caddo County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 5,043
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Caddo County, Oklahoma totaled $506,278,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lonnie G King | Hydro, OK 73048 | $1,224,904 |
62 | Herschel House Living Trust | Hinton, OK 73047 | $1,214,524 |
63 | O M Farms Inc | Binger, OK 73009 | $1,180,602 |
64 | Grover E Skaggs Jr | Fort Cobb, OK 73038 | $1,180,342 |
65 | James Frederick Oswald | Fort Cobb, OK 73038 | $1,179,131 |
66 | Jeff K House | Hydro, OK 73048 | $1,175,722 |
67 | Krehbiel Farms LLC | Hydro, OK 73048 | $1,163,807 |
68 | Ricky Joe Farrow | Gracemont, OK 73042 | $1,159,305 |
69 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,149,405 |
70 | Roy L Erman | Apache, OK 73006 | $1,140,625 |
71 | Montgomery Farms Inc | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $1,136,299 |
72 | Donald Mason Revocable Trust | Hinton, OK 73047 | $1,099,918 |
73 | Allen Dietrich | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $1,097,237 |
74 | Lazy D Farms LLC | Binger, OK 73009 | $1,091,232 |
75 | David R Farmer | Fort Cobb, OK 73038 | $1,083,761 |
76 | Edwin Opitz | Hinton, OK 73047 | $1,077,599 |
77 | Terry W Lierle | Hydro, OK 73048 | $1,067,228 |
78 | Burns Family Cattle LLC | Anadarko, OK 73005 | $1,051,699 |
79 | Mark Slemp | Gracemont, OK 73042 | $1,049,738 |
80 | James T Murphy Rev Trust | Oklahoma City, OK 73132 | $1,028,302 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”