Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Caddo County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 425
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Caddo County, Oklahoma totaled $439,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kelsey Lokey | Lookeba, OK 73053 | $1,756 |
82 | Roland Farms Inc | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $1,741 |
83 | Iris Elaine Balch Lvg Trust | Hydro, OK 73048 | $1,728 |
84 | Cedar Creek Spraying Service | Mountain View, OK 73062 | $1,724 |
85 | William Bennie Gabehart | Minco, OK 73059 | $1,709 |
86 | Kimberlee Squires | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $1,702 |
87 | Dean Smith | Hydro, OK 73048 | $1,653 |
88 | Keith Gardner | Binger, OK 73009 | $1,637 |
89 | Tony Mccullough | Fort Cobb, OK 73038 | $1,635 |
90 | Lee Taylor Cameron | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $1,625 |
91 | William Dawson Stephens | Mountain View, OK 73062 | $1,624 |
92 | Verl M Daugherty | Gracemont, OK 73042 | $1,596 |
93 | Lazy D Farms LLC | Binger, OK 73009 | $1,559 |
94 | Clay Farms | Lookeba, OK 73053 | $1,528 |
95 | Chafen D Pettit | Carnegie, OK 73015 | $1,513 |
96 | Roy Franklin Sechrist | Gracemont, OK 73042 | $1,501 |
97 | Raymond Klassen | Lookeba, OK 73053 | $1,501 |
98 | D & D Farms Inc | Lookeba, OK 73053 | $1,421 |
99 | Larry Rogers | Fort Cobb, OK 73038 | $1,415 |
100 | Wayne Crissman | Hydro, OK 73048 | $1,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”