Farm Subsidy information
Cherokee County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Cherokee County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 531
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cherokee County, Oklahoma totaled $1,599,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Roger Allen Hamilton | Bunch, OK 74931 | $2,240 |
122 | 2saun Farms Inc | Colcord, OK 74338 | $2,228 |
123 | Jarrad Scott Duty | Muldrow, OK 74948 | $2,223 |
124 | Darin Alexander Madding | Sallisaw, OK 74955 | $2,215 |
125 | Billy J Snyder | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $2,214 |
126 | Melvin W Burns | Park Hill, OK 74451 | $2,168 |
127 | J B Fite Swannanoa Irrevocable Trust | Tahlequah, OK 74465 | $2,133 |
128 | Micheal D Back | Rose, OK 74364 | $2,122 |
129 | Larry Slape | Hulbert, OK 74441 | $2,093 |
130 | Clinton Leonard Davis | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $2,093 |
131 | Heather Eileen Willis | Locust Grove, OK 74352 | $2,082 |
132 | Donald Joe Benham | Stilwell, OK 74960 | $2,030 |
133 | Colton Heath Barnes | Park Hill, OK 74451 | $2,002 |
134 | Steeley Springs Ranch LLC | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $1,992 |
135 | Ryan L Dirteater | Hulbert, OK 74441 | $1,989 |
136 | Christopher W Plank | Gans, OK 74936 | $1,979 |
137 | Sammy Lamons | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $1,975 |
138 | James E Moss | Hulbert, OK 74441 | $1,969 |
139 | 4m Cattle Company | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $1,968 |
140 | Harold Lee Chance | Okmulgee, OK 74447 | $1,955 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”