Farm Subsidy information
Cherokee County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Cherokee County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,558
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cherokee County, Oklahoma totaled $32,943,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Ricky A Petitt | Park Hill, OK 74451 | $43,150 |
142 | Larry E Hayes | Park Hill, OK 74451 | $43,017 |
143 | Donna Jones | Peggs, OK 74452 | $42,838 |
144 | Thomas Hudgens | Welling, OK 74471 | $42,712 |
145 | Matthew Steeley | Hulbert, OK 74441 | $42,224 |
146 | J B Fite Swannanoa Irrevocable Trust | Tahlequah, OK 74465 | $42,164 |
147 | Bryan Edward Crow | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $41,966 |
148 | Duaine Harold Passmore | Rose, OK 74364 | $41,593 |
149 | Tim Booth | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $41,523 |
150 | James E Moss | Hulbert, OK 74441 | $41,491 |
151 | Darrell Ray Guffey | Welling, OK 74471 | $41,384 |
152 | Larry R Lockwood | Proctor, OK 74457 | $40,673 |
153 | Ricky D Bailey Revocable Trust | Hulbert, OK 74441 | $40,575 |
154 | Nab Inc. | Twin Oaks, OK 74368 | $40,525 |
155 | Kim Collins | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $40,392 |
156 | Leon Adams | Hulbert, OK 74441 | $40,275 |
157 | Robert Waddle | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $39,876 |
158 | Micheal D Back | Rose, OK 74364 | $39,609 |
159 | Bobby E Shankles | Tahlequah, OK 74464 | $39,333 |
160 | Michael Sheets | Stilwell, OK 74960 | $39,011 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”