Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 156
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Cimarron County, Oklahoma totaled $1,654,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Arthur Lowane Williamson Revocable Living Trust | Felt, OK 73937 | $19,625 |
22 | , | $18,351 | |
23 | G & M Agventures | Boise City, OK 73933 | $17,971 |
24 | John Verner Smith | Boise City, OK 73933 | $17,780 |
25 | L & J Land & Cattle LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $17,467 |
26 | Dara Zane Vaughan | Boise City, OK 73933 | $16,600 |
27 | Sheldon Wilson | Folsom, NM 88419 | $16,320 |
28 | Abel Deboer | Felt, OK 73937 | $16,278 |
29 | 2m Land & Cattle LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $15,069 |
30 | Will T Young | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $14,843 |
31 | Jerry Rice | Boise City, OK 73933 | $14,663 |
32 | Colter Wells | Boise City, OK 73933 | $14,119 |
33 | Windriver Cattle LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $13,794 |
34 | Doak-crabtree Ranch Trust Crabtree | Stratford, TX 79084 | $13,551 |
35 | May Cattle Company | Felt, OK 73937 | $13,359 |
36 | Tapp Brothers Land & Cattle LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $13,230 |
37 | Whit Warner | Boise City, OK 73933 | $13,209 |
38 | Paul Wells | Boise City, OK 73933 | $12,882 |
39 | Thomas T James | Felt, OK 73937 | $12,152 |
40 | Buffalo Wallow LLC | Jackson, MS 39211 | $12,093 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”