Total Commodity Programs in Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,484
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cimarron County, Oklahoma totaled $173,280,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | 3 - J Farms Inc | Felt, OK 73937 | $1,216,287 |
22 | Four S Farms | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $1,199,972 |
23 | G & M Agventures | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,193,987 |
24 | Harvest Days Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $1,135,101 |
25 | Tig Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $1,129,383 |
26 | Kenneth A Rose Living Trust | Keyes, OK 73947 | $1,118,748 |
27 | Paul Smith | Felt, OK 73937 | $1,107,978 |
28 | Lowe Land & Livestock Ltd | Keyes, OK 73947 | $1,105,834 |
29 | Duane Smith | Felt, OK 73937 | $1,086,015 |
30 | Jeffery Wayne Compton | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $1,085,092 |
31 | Fry Land & Cattle Co | Keyes, OK 73947 | $1,081,901 |
32 | Hinds Ag Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $1,080,417 |
33 | Scott Alan Arthaud | Keyes, OK 73947 | $1,048,941 |
34 | B J Farms Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $1,037,801 |
35 | Wilson Farms | Boise City, OK 73933 | $976,214 |
36 | Arthur Lowane Williamson Revocable Living Trust | Felt, OK 73937 | $965,034 |
37 | John Patrick Bourk | Boise City, OK 73933 | $959,345 |
38 | Minor Shad Imler | Boise City, OK 73933 | $958,905 |
39 | Lori Dawn Stewart | Keyes, OK 73947 | $948,644 |
40 | Celebrity Feeders | Felt, OK 73937 | $940,993 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”