Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 217
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Cimarron County, Oklahoma totaled $621,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Clare Ilise Dunn | Two Buttes, CO 81084 | $858 |
102 | Keagen Chance Vaughan | Boise City, OK 73933 | $833 |
103 | Sawyer Zane Vaughan | Boise City, OK 73933 | $833 |
104 | , | $813 | |
105 | Cole Earl Twombly | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $792 |
106 | Riley Carl Mcnabb | Boise City, OK 73933 | $759 |
107 | Prudence Bourk | Boise City, OK 73933 | $752 |
108 | Morene L Minns Trust | Goodwell, OK 73939 | $671 |
109 | Zh Cattle LLC | Yukon, OK 73099 | $644 |
110 | Yvonne Jo Whitman | Iowa Park, TX 76367 | $629 |
111 | Steven Ross Brillhart | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $569 |
112 | Lloyd J Holloway Marital Test Trt A | Elk City, OK 73648 | $563 |
113 | Jo Ellen Stevens | Bernice, LA 71222 | $562 |
114 | David Lynn Pugh 1996 Trust | Keyes, OK 73947 | $559 |
115 | Amy Leann Bayer | Meadow, TX 79345 | $539 |
116 | Ora Marie Hanes | Keller, TX 76248 | $530 |
117 | Clarence Frank Twombly | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $487 |
118 | Michael Hiner | Boise City, OK 73933 | $438 |
119 | Beth Giles | Arlington, TX 76017 | $434 |
120 | Trevor Lee Montgomery | Tulsa, OK 74134 | $420 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”