Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 136
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Cimarron County, Oklahoma totaled $2,289,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Robert D Wilson | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,331 |
102 | Scott C Murdock | Felt, OK 73937 | $2,193 |
103 | Eddie T Walker | Kenton, OK 73946 | $2,123 |
104 | Douglas Wayne Ottinger | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,102 |
105 | Jennifer Jenyne Boyd | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,077 |
106 | Donnie Adee | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,951 |
107 | Billy L Elliott | Stratford, TX 79084 | $1,934 |
108 | Stuart Hutchison | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,872 |
109 | Regnier Ranch | Kenton, OK 73946 | $1,872 |
110 | Barbara F Kenney | Texline, TX 79087 | $1,839 |
111 | Vernon Cryer | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,587 |
112 | Tommy Barnes | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,425 |
113 | Don Carl Cryer | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,316 |
114 | Judy C Tapp | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,301 |
115 | Alan Shields | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,301 |
116 | Colby Quinn Thrall | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,238 |
117 | Travis Lynn Thrall | Felt, OK 73937 | $1,238 |
118 | Wayne Tooley | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,235 |
119 | Gary Frank Maness | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,213 |
120 | David Wayne Crawford | Boise City, OK 73933 | $1,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”