Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 156
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Cimarron County, Oklahoma totaled $1,654,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Cade Murdock | Felt, OK 73937 | $3,046 |
102 | Timothy Joe Hanvey | Keyes, OK 73947 | $2,912 |
103 | Austin Smith | Felt, OK 73937 | $2,761 |
104 | Rusty Murdock | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,715 |
105 | Arvel Lee Perky Testamentary Trust | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,693 |
106 | Tila Mae Dunn | Keyes, OK 73947 | $2,686 |
107 | Roy Breck Dunn | Keyes, OK 73947 | $2,686 |
108 | Tracy Brown | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,628 |
109 | Don Carl Cryer | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,525 |
110 | Opal L Cryer | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,525 |
111 | Carl Thrall Estate | Felt, OK 73937 | $2,478 |
112 | George W Collins | Kenton, OK 73946 | $2,427 |
113 | Jerod Matthew Warner | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,358 |
114 | Stephen W Johnson | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,246 |
115 | Twombly & Sons Farms Inc | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $2,246 |
116 | Nathan Johnson | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,196 |
117 | Shane Thrash | Felt, OK 73937 | $2,133 |
118 | Tanner Warner | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,088 |
119 | Colby Quinn Thrall | Boise City, OK 73933 | $2,019 |
120 | , | $1,962 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”