Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 136
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Cimarron County, Oklahoma totaled $2,289,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chuck Murdock 2009 Trust | Boise City, OK 73933 | $228,673 |
2 | Rusty Murdock | Boise City, OK 73933 | $218,123 |
3 | Margaret F Murdock Dba Margie Murdock 2009 Trust | Boise City, OK 73933 | $209,179 |
4 | Open A Partnershp | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $157,784 |
5 | Gary L Spielman | Boise City, OK 73933 | $108,714 |
6 | G & M Agventures | Boise City, OK 73933 | $63,155 |
7 | Hinds Operating Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $59,785 |
8 | Tad Cullum | Keyes, OK 73947 | $57,724 |
9 | Mena Livestock Auction | Mena, AR 71953 | $54,707 |
10 | Karina L Ibarra De Morales | Boise City, OK 73933 | $50,297 |
11 | Kevin Spielman Cattle Co | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $50,179 |
12 | Clay Preston Crabtree | Boise City, OK 73933 | $50,014 |
13 | William J Murdock | Boise City, OK 73933 | $49,412 |
14 | Douglas John Murdock | Felt, OK 73937 | $46,661 |
15 | West Edge Inc | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $43,898 |
16 | Travis Wayne Brown | Boise City, OK 73933 | $39,689 |
17 | Ronald D Carey | Boise City, OK 73933 | $35,781 |
18 | G & M Agventure | Boise City, OK 73933 | $26,357 |
19 | 2m Land & Cattle LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $26,193 |
20 | Arthaud Farms Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $24,413 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>