Total Conservation Programs in Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 409
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cimarron County, Oklahoma totaled $3,785,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jesse W James | Boise City, OK 73933 | $52,284 |
2 | Gayla J James | Boise City, OK 73933 | $52,284 |
3 | Gowdy Land & Cattle Corp | Oklahoma City, OK 73157 | $50,000 |
4 | 2m Land & Cattle LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $50,000 |
5 | , | $49,809 | |
6 | Rita K Smith | Boise City, OK 73933 | $49,553 |
7 | Potter And Potter LLC | Bryan, TX 77803 | $47,638 |
8 | John Verner Smith | Boise City, OK 73933 | $46,702 |
9 | Aubrey Foreman Farms Inc | Perry, OK 73077 | $45,632 |
10 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $45,258 |
11 | Arthur Lowane Williamson Revocable Living Trust | Felt, OK 73937 | $44,663 |
12 | Doak-crabtree Ranch Trust Crabtree | Stratford, TX 79084 | $43,533 |
13 | Lisa-crabtree Ranch Trust Crabtree | Stratford, TX 79084 | $43,533 |
14 | Clay Preston Crabtree | Boise City, OK 73933 | $41,748 |
15 | Belva Witt | Perryton, TX 79070 | $38,831 |
16 | Stanley W Holloway | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $37,764 |
17 | Marie Holloway | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $36,707 |
18 | Opal L Cryer | Boise City, OK 73933 | $35,813 |
19 | Kenneth W Isom | Idalou, TX 79329 | $35,157 |
20 | Eddie And Theresa Stafford Revocable Living Trust | Keyes, OK 73947 | $33,272 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>