Farm Subsidy information
Cleveland County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Cleveland County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 840
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cleveland County, Oklahoma totaled $17,343,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tommy Mcgregor | Norman, OK 73026 | $53,638 |
62 | Charles Johnson | Norman, OK 73026 | $53,623 |
63 | William L Baskett | Oklahoma City, OK 73165 | $53,130 |
64 | Frankie L Dye | Oklahoma City, OK 73129 | $52,959 |
65 | Robin L Walters | Noble, OK 73068 | $52,532 |
66 | Tracy Van Horn | Lexington, OK 73051 | $52,308 |
67 | W J Keeler | Lexington, OK 73051 | $50,202 |
68 | Mappes And Mappes Livestock | Moore, OK 73153 | $49,808 |
69 | Donny Kirby | Noble, OK 73068 | $48,470 |
70 | George Matthesen | Moore, OK 73160 | $48,111 |
71 | Mike Kraus | Oklahoma City, OK 73169 | $47,880 |
72 | Randy Eugene Fannin | Norman, OK 73026 | $47,621 |
73 | Lc Land And Cattle, LLC | Noble, OK 73068 | $47,177 |
74 | Jerry Ray Vaught | Lexington, OK 73051 | $47,007 |
75 | Charles Greeson | Oklahoma City, OK 73170 | $46,817 |
76 | Mappes And Mappes Livestock | Norman, OK 73026 | $46,682 |
77 | Oliver Dale Horton | Norman, OK 73026 | $46,355 |
78 | James Harry Little Jr | Lexington, OK 73051 | $44,888 |
79 | Toby Bogart | Oklahoma City, OK 73173 | $44,716 |
80 | Gene Warr | Oklahoma City, OK 73132 | $44,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”