Farm Subsidy information
Coal County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Coal County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 844
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Coal County, Oklahoma totaled $25,143,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Geo Thomas Lutes | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $129,733 |
42 | Joel A Coffee | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $127,581 |
43 | Randy Nelson | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $127,508 |
44 | Berniece Crane | Centrahoma, OK 74534 | $116,999 |
45 | Rafter 5m Land & Cattle, Lp | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $116,593 |
46 | Megan Whitaker | Centrahoma, OK 74534 | $113,794 |
47 | Nancy Staggs Coats | Oklahoma City, OK 73116 | $113,056 |
48 | Phillip Hatridge | Kiowa, OK 74553 | $111,669 |
49 | William M Baskett Jr | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $111,547 |
50 | Tommy Wood | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $111,367 |
51 | Jim E Cox | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $110,558 |
52 | Melva Cleo Thomas | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $109,445 |
53 | Wanda A Nelson Estate | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $107,860 |
54 | Chris P Collins | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $107,135 |
55 | Jimmy B Carter | Ada, OK 74820 | $106,518 |
56 | Bull Mountain Land & Cattle | Centrahoma, OK 74534 | $106,277 |
57 | Dane Brecheen | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $105,759 |
58 | Ms Nancy S Coats | Oklahoma City, OK 73116 | $102,772 |
59 | Mark Z Thomas | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $102,481 |
60 | Ernest Paul Fanning | Coalgate, OK 74538 | $101,834 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”