Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Cotton County, Oklahoma, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 313
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Cotton County, Oklahoma totaled $5,947,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Grady B Benson | Randlett, OK 73562 | $61,566 |
22 | Steven Baber | Devol, OK 73531 | $60,759 |
23 | Shelley A Baber | Devol, OK 73531 | $60,759 |
24 | David Lynn Taylor | Walters, OK 73572 | $59,412 |
25 | Kelly Lee Wineinger | Wichita Falls, TX 76305 | $59,342 |
26 | Weston Hoodenpyle | Walters, OK 73572 | $59,228 |
27 | Walter Earl Cox | Temple, OK 73568 | $58,032 |
28 | Dan Ray Eschler | Lawton, OK 73505 | $57,591 |
29 | David N Taylor | Randlett, OK 73562 | $55,810 |
30 | Robert Mac Dobbs | Temple, OK 73568 | $54,879 |
31 | Stephen L Dilks II | Walters, OK 73572 | $53,469 |
32 | Rex Wallace Claxton | Chattanooga, OK 73528 | $50,779 |
33 | Stephen Dilks | Randlett, OK 73562 | $50,379 |
34 | Harry Don Bowles | Devol, OK 73531 | $49,754 |
35 | James Keeter | Walters, OK 73572 | $49,635 |
36 | Edward Dewayne Calfy | Walters, OK 73572 | $47,577 |
37 | John Scott | Walters, OK 73572 | $46,829 |
38 | Shane Dilks | Walters, OK 73572 | $45,655 |
39 | Stephen Blake Schumpert | Chattanooga, OK 73528 | $45,337 |
40 | Jason D Adams | Devol, OK 73531 | $45,097 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”