Farm Subsidy information
Cotton County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Cotton County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 522
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cotton County, Oklahoma totaled $10,031,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bancfirst ** | Frederick, OK 73542 | $408,320 |
| 2 | Tony W High | Walters, OK 73572 | $221,492 |
| 3 | Jerry Thompson | Walters, OK 73572 | $165,604 |
| 4 | Joe Thompson | Temple, OK 73568 | $160,066 |
| 5 | Brett High | Walters, OK 73572 | $157,119 |
| 6 | Jerry Joseph Johnson | Devol, OK 73531 | $147,520 |
| 7 | Ralph Wayne Hoodenpyle | Walters, OK 73572 | $127,959 |
| 8 | Pat Mcintyre Dba Mcintyre Farms Gp | Temple, OK 73568 | $123,514 |
| 9 | Kelly Lee Wineinger | Wichita Falls, TX 76305 | $113,382 |
| 10 | Vache Operations LLC | Randlett, OK 73562 | $110,008 |
| 11 | Grady B Benson | Randlett, OK 73562 | $105,713 |
| 12 | Bar F Cattle LLC | Randlett, OK 73562 | $100,621 |
| 13 | Cge Cattle Company LLC | Lawton, OK 73507 | $96,708 |
| 14 | Kimberlie Scherler | Walters, OK 73572 | $95,647 |
| 15 | Scott Laminack | Devol, OK 73531 | $94,794 |
| 16 | Rick Beard | Devol, OK 73531 | $93,437 |
| 17 | Dennis Bachand | Waurika, OK 73573 | $83,378 |
| 18 | Stephen Blake Schumpert | Chattanooga, OK 73528 | $77,778 |
| 19 | Ricky High | Walters, OK 73572 | $74,509 |
| 20 | Bobby Deon White | Walters, OK 73572 | $72,851 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf