Total Commodity Programs in Custer County, Oklahoma, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 330
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Custer County, Oklahoma totaled $1,501,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roger Watson | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $4,046 |
82 | Roderick W Jones Revocable Trust | Thomas, OK 73669 | $3,988 |
83 | Melvin Eyster 1992 Irr Trust | Thomas, OK 73669 | $3,933 |
84 | Blake Sappington | Clinton, OK 73601 | $3,909 |
85 | Hutchison Livestock LLC | Richardson, TX 75080 | $3,887 |
86 | Isaac & Cheryle Crawford Living Trust | Custer City, OK 73639 | $3,764 |
87 | Della Jean Littleton | Clinton, OK 73601 | $3,733 |
88 | Paul Dean Wingard | Thomas, OK 73669 | $3,704 |
89 | Dickey Family LLC | Edmond, OK 73013 | $3,614 |
90 | Tony Vogt | Corn, OK 73024 | $3,555 |
91 | James Evan Plummer | Geary, OK 73040 | $3,465 |
92 | Todd Wilson Farms LLC | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $3,430 |
93 | Harrison Cattle Company LLC | Arapaho, OK 73620 | $3,383 |
94 | Deer Creek Cattle Co | Thomas, OK 73669 | $3,380 |
95 | , | $3,337 | |
96 | John Zerby | Custer City, OK 73639 | $3,297 |
97 | Dean Collins | Hammon, OK 73650 | $3,245 |
98 | Shane D Fawver | Arapaho, OK 73620 | $3,209 |
99 | Keith Allen Manney | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $3,072 |
100 | Jacob R Peck | Canute, OK 73626 | $3,058 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”