Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Custer County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 848
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Custer County, Oklahoma totaled $5,821,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Brad Perkins | Thomas, OK 73669 | $15,278 |
102 | Wendell Dunn | Elk City, OK 73644 | $14,874 |
103 | Rex Eagan | Arapaho, OK 73620 | $14,710 |
104 | Matthew R Baker | Butler, OK 73625 | $14,683 |
105 | 2e Farm & Ranch LLC | Thomas, OK 73669 | $14,578 |
106 | Marilyn Kay Moseley | Hammon, OK 73650 | $14,510 |
107 | Switzer Farms Inc | Thomas, OK 73669 | $14,398 |
108 | Gerald E Anderson Jr | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $14,296 |
109 | Roger Dean Christensen | Thomas, OK 73669 | $13,992 |
110 | Scott Fransen | Clinton, OK 73601 | $13,991 |
111 | Carl Farni | Elk City, OK 73648 | $13,978 |
112 | Laura Schrock | Thomas, OK 73669 | $13,738 |
113 | Cornerstone Bank ** | Watonga, OK 73772 | $13,562 |
114 | Michael L Wright | Minco, OK 73059 | $13,442 |
115 | Foy Lee Littleton | Clinton, OK 73601 | $13,210 |
116 | Johnnie Lynn Dixon | Foss, OK 73647 | $13,033 |
117 | James E Mclaughlin | Clinton, OK 73601 | $13,003 |
118 | Tommy Klein | Clinton, OK 73601 | $12,736 |
119 | C L Ray | Butler, OK 73625 | $12,698 |
120 | Ritchie Johnston | Custer City, OK 73639 | $12,575 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”