Total Disaster Programs in Custer County, Oklahoma, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 593
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Custer County, Oklahoma totaled $9,999,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Newton Benjamin Miller | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $30,060 |
102 | Lloyd W Searcey | Edmond, OK 73012 | $29,997 |
103 | Drew Hays | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $29,898 |
104 | Roger Coit | Custer City, OK 73639 | $29,885 |
105 | Stenson Alister Miller | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $29,572 |
106 | Tina Mannering | Custer City, OK 73639 | $28,332 |
107 | Brandon Miller | Custer City, OK 73639 | $28,208 |
108 | Garland D Leonard | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $28,099 |
109 | Billy J Sawatzky | Custer City, OK 73639 | $27,906 |
110 | Woodrow Chad Kimble | Hydro, OK 73048 | $27,281 |
111 | Johnnie Lynn Dixon | Clinton, OK 73601 | $27,275 |
112 | Rickie Kauk | Arapaho, OK 73620 | $26,733 |
113 | Clay Derek Kauk | Arapaho, OK 73620 | $26,410 |
114 | Donna Snider | Clinton, OK 73601 | $25,927 |
115 | Rex Eagan | Arapaho, OK 73620 | $25,136 |
116 | Kurt Hamburger | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $25,014 |
117 | Larry J Mcconnell | Canute, OK 73626 | $24,995 |
118 | Mark Cobb | Butler, OK 73625 | $24,918 |
119 | Don Regier | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $24,880 |
120 | Brad Perkins | Thomas, OK 73669 | $24,559 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”