Market Loss Assistance Program in Custer County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,515
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Custer County, Oklahoma totaled $17,953,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Greg Collins | Butler, OK 73625 | $46,294 |
102 | Larry Herring | Elk City, OK 73644 | $46,182 |
103 | Jones Brothers Farming & Ranching | Custer City, OK 73639 | $45,978 |
104 | Jane Lorenz | Thomas, OK 73669 | $44,771 |
105 | James Lorenz | Thomas, OK 73669 | $44,771 |
106 | Michael Blain Brinkley | Clinton, OK 73601 | $44,097 |
107 | Donald G Hix | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $43,712 |
108 | Charles Shephard | Arapaho, OK 73620 | $42,919 |
109 | Bertha Miller | Thomas, OK 73669 | $42,584 |
110 | Michael J Travis | Thomas, OK 73669 | $42,402 |
111 | Taylor Farms | Thomas, OK 73669 | $42,198 |
112 | Terry L Hamburger | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $41,977 |
113 | Tina Mannering | Custer City, OK 73639 | $41,830 |
114 | Mike Cornell | Clinton, OK 73601 | $41,794 |
115 | Branham Revocable Trust | Lake Kiowa, TX 76240 | $41,697 |
116 | George Meacham | Hydro, OK 73048 | $41,672 |
117 | Lelan Wright | Butler, OK 73625 | $41,193 |
118 | Garland D Leonard | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $40,957 |
119 | Melvin Eyster | Thomas, OK 73669 | $40,620 |
120 | Chad Edward Lee | Custer City, OK 73639 | $40,617 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”