Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Custer County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 578
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Custer County, Oklahoma totaled $2,230,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | 2 D Livestock LLC | Corn, OK 73024 | $4,241 |
142 | Chad Edward Lee | Custer City, OK 73639 | $4,185 |
143 | Stutzman Farms LLC | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $4,117 |
144 | Timothy D Frymire | Thomas, OK 73669 | $4,081 |
145 | Della Jean Littleton | Clinton, OK 73601 | $4,064 |
146 | James Evan Plummer | Geary, OK 73040 | $3,988 |
147 | Alan John Hoffman | Clinton, OK 73601 | $3,923 |
148 | William Richard Entz | Hydro, OK 73048 | $3,892 |
149 | Ralph Ellis Teeter | Butler, OK 73625 | $3,872 |
150 | Eddie Barnard | Leedey, OK 73654 | $3,806 |
151 | Mike D Jones | Custer City, OK 73639 | $3,773 |
152 | Steven Cornell | Custer City, OK 73639 | $3,723 |
153 | Brandon Miller | Custer City, OK 73639 | $3,715 |
154 | Harold Miller | Custer City, OK 73639 | $3,709 |
155 | Jacob R Peck | Canute, OK 73626 | $3,630 |
156 | C J Taylor | Canute, OK 73626 | $3,580 |
157 | Ryan Wray | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $3,536 |
158 | Chris D Renison | Custer City, OK 73639 | $3,531 |
159 | James A Shepherd | Clinton, OK 73601 | $3,510 |
160 | Brock A Meacham | Hydro, OK 73048 | $3,492 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”