Market Gains in Custer County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 109
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Custer County, Oklahoma totaled $870,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert A Frymire | Thomas, OK 73669 | $12,425 |
22 | Tina Mannering | Custer City, OK 73639 | $12,265 |
23 | James Robert Dozier | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $11,571 |
24 | Rodney P Wherritt | Thomas, OK 73669 | $11,089 |
25 | Howard J Bartel | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $10,713 |
26 | Alvin D Baker | Butler, OK 73625 | $10,348 |
27 | George Coulson | Clinton, OK 73601 | $9,365 |
28 | Carrol J Hoffman | Clinton, OK 73601 | $9,300 |
29 | Rex Eagan | Arapaho, OK 73620 | $8,429 |
30 | Frymire Farms | Thomas, OK 73669 | $8,291 |
31 | John Zerby | Custer City, OK 73639 | $7,833 |
32 | Newton Benjamin Miller | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $7,826 |
33 | Bradley W Spencer | Butler, OK 73625 | $7,750 |
34 | Kevin D Deevers | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $7,490 |
35 | Terry L Hamburger | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $6,921 |
36 | George Meacham | Hydro, OK 73048 | $6,716 |
37 | Jeffery Alan Dozier | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $6,412 |
38 | Titus Stutzman | Hydro, OK 73048 | $6,245 |
39 | Calvin R Koehn | Thomas, OK 73669 | $6,150 |
40 | Foy Lee Littleton | Clinton, OK 73601 | $6,045 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”