Farm Subsidy information
Ellis County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Ellis County, Oklahoma, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 585
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ellis County, Oklahoma totaled $9,516,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James L Sweet | Vici, OK 73859 | $32,776 |
62 | R & J Livestock | Gage, OK 73843 | $32,617 |
63 | Robert W Thomas | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $32,377 |
64 | Murphy Land & Cattle LLC | May, OK 73851 | $32,098 |
65 | Jeffrey Gross | Arnett, OK 73832 | $31,521 |
66 | Justin Barr | Arnett, OK 73832 | $30,630 |
67 | Martin R Hamilton | Arnett, OK 73832 | $30,578 |
68 | Cliff A Moyer | Gage, OK 73843 | $30,542 |
69 | Lonnie Starbuck | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $30,408 |
70 | Michael Schneider | Fargo, OK 73840 | $29,479 |
71 | Heath Gaisford | Gage, OK 73843 | $29,244 |
72 | Norman Louis Thomas Jr | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $28,856 |
73 | Shepherd Land & Cattle LLC | Gage, OK 73843 | $28,740 |
74 | Fanning Management, LLC | May, OK 73851 | $28,636 |
75 | Kenneth Moyer | Gage, OK 73843 | $28,203 |
76 | Evergreen Land & Cattle, LLC | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $27,839 |
77 | Logan Charles Coffee | Canadian, TX 79014 | $27,509 |
78 | Mandy Schilling | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $27,413 |
79 | Donna Satterwhite | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $27,337 |
80 | Quineta Geraldine Beagle Wylie | Arnett, OK 73832 | $27,165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”